While Democrat and Republican legislators cannot seem to
agree on any of the pressing issues facing them recently, one law seems to
have gained almost complete bipartisan accord in the Texas House lately: a ban
on texting while driving. Texting while
driving has been shown to affect a driver’s ability to safely control a
vehicle, and has been responsible for numerous accidents, even deaths. It is a risky, unnecessary act that many feel
should be penalized in order to deter drivers from doing it. As such, a law has been proposed to enforce a
fine of up to $100 for any driver caught texting while driving. A similar measure has been put into action in
39 other states, as well as 25 Texas cities (Austin being the first). The statewide ban has received support from
both political parties, and has been popular among a majority of
legislators. Nonetheless, the bill is
expected to be vetoed by Governor Rick Perry.
According
to this editorial, Rick Perry is expected to veto this bill, much like he vetoed
a similar bill two years ago. While
Perry does agree that texting while driving is dangerous and irresponsible, he
does not feel it is the government’s duty to regulate what people do. True to his small-government platform, Perry
does not want the government to have the right to tell people what is and is
not safe, calling the bill “a government effort to micromanage the behavior of
adults”.
This
editorial, written by the Editorial Board of the Austin Statesman, does a great
job of not letting such a foolish comment and flimsy argument by Mr. Perry go
unridiculed. They point out that by
encouraging or discouraging certain actions, managing behavior is exactly what
laws are designed to do. They also
question his logic by questioning how laws prohibiting drunk driving or
requiring seatbelts are legitimate but a law barring texting while driving is
somehow “micromanagement”.
While
this editorial is aimed at Governor Rick Perry, imploring him to sign the
texting ban bill when it makes it to his desk, the broader audience is readers
who may still feel on the fence towards texting while driving. Some readers may feel texting while driving
is their right, and the government has no place in dictating their behavior; others
may simply not be aware of how risky this behavior is. The article presents hard facts and
information from studies to provide indisputable proof that texting while
driving causes accidents, and has been responsible for numerous deaths. With such high credibility and impassioned
plea in favor of a law that seemingly should pass through unquestioned, it is
hard not to agree with the authors that the ban on texting while driving should
be signed by Mr. Perry.
No comments:
Post a Comment